About a year ago, I said that the real tragedy of the COVID vackseens was going to become apparent soon. Because that was when the women who were pregnant when they received their vackseen were going to give birth.
Nobody knew what was going to happen. The vackseens were rushed to market without proper testing but still were deemed safe for pregnant women. But nobody knew if the vackseens were safe for pregnant or soon-to-be-pregnant women because it was impossible to know for sure. Because nobody took the time to look.
Checking how pregnancies are affected by anything is not something that can be rushed. You need to run your trials for at least 20 years before you can completely understand how something affects a developing human. So, running a trial for a few weeks simply isn’t enough time to identify the risks to pregnant women and their unborn children, or their infants, or their toddlers, or their adolescents, or their young adults.
It becomes even more problematic if, in the interest of inclusivity, the studies were done using men who identified as pregnant women.
Let’s pause and consider that for a minute. No matter what the “woke” left wants you to believe, there is a distinct difference between men and women. I haven’t run a clinical trial, but logic would lead me to believe that being able to separate the results into male and female categories would be pretty important.
But what if a mentally-ill man, who believes he’s a woman, wanted to participate in the trial? What would they classify him as? If the answer is anything other than “male”, then I’d have to completely disregard any and all results that come from the trial. As a man, it probably wouldn’t make much of a difference to me because the results of my group wouldn’t be tainted by misclassification. But, if I were a woman…a real woman, the skewed results generated by the desire to be tolerant and inclusive may actually put my life in danger.
I’m not suggesting that’s what we’re seeing now. Because I hope that nobody would be that stupid. It is however, sadly a possibility. I’ve seen crazier things in the past couple of years.
But, let’s get back to my original thought.
There have been many, many reports of vacksinated women delivering infants born with health issues and/or birth defects. Big Pharma is quick to tell you that there is no correlation between their vackseens and these sickly newborns.
What else do you expect them to say?
If these adverse reactions keep piling up, eventually they’re going to have to change their slogan to something other than “safe and effective”. I think we’ve reached that point.
Now we’re seeing reports from around the world about the drastic increase in miscarriages. One estimate says that as high as 90% of vacksinated mothers-to-be aren’t carrying their babies to term.
90% seems a little high. On average, about 15% of all pregnancies aren’t carried to term. If that number suddenly jumped to 90%, even the liberal media would be forced to report it. And, since they’re still not saying anything about the sudden increase in miscarriages and stillbirths, I think it’s safe to assume that the number is greater than 15%, but still small enough that they can ignore it.
So, the number is probably somewhere between 15% and 90%. I don’t want to be accused of sensationalism, so let’s say the vackseen increased the number of miscarriages from 15% to 16%. That seems like a number that is certainly possible.
Now, let’s put that in perspective. I’ll even do the math for you.
In the United States alone, an increase of a single percentage point in the number of miscarriages, in other words, moving the needle from 15% to 16%, equals slightly more than 36,000 more dead babies per year.
Now, let’s put that in perspective.
According to “official” reports, more than a million people have died with COVID in the U.S. Anyone paying even the slightest amount of attention knows that the official COVID death count has been wildly exaggerated and there’s a difference between dying with COVID and dying from COVID. Even the CDC admits the number being reported is about 94% too high. The total number of people in the U.S. who have actually died from COVID is probably somewhere around 60,000.
The vackseens have been available for almost two years. If the vackseens increased the miscarriage rate by only one percent, the increase in the number of dead babies would be more than the number of people who died from the disease. And that’s just if there was only a 1% increase. From the sad stories we’ve been hearing from previously-mothers-to-be, the increase seems to be actually much greater than that.
On Pfizer’s COVID-19 vackseen site, there’s a section that’s called “IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION”. It says, among other things, that you should “Tell your vaccination provider about all of your medical conditions, including if you are pregnant, plan to become pregnant or are breastfeeding.”
OK. I’ll play along. Let’s say you’re a woman of child-bearing age. You go to Walgreens and tell the minimum-wage worker responsible for giving you the shot that you’re pregnant or are planning on becoming pregnant. Then what?
If this were any other drug, you’d be advised not to take it because it may harm your fetus or reduce your chances of a successful pregnancy when you do decide to start a family. At the very least, you’d be told to discuss it with your doctor.
Not with the COVID vackseens. With those, the response would be something like, “Meh. It’ll probably be OK”.
Even worse, if you are referred to your doctor, and live in California, it’s illegal for him or her to even mention that the drugs may be harmful to you and your baby.
Nobody has ever accused Big Pharma of having a heart. There are only two reasons they’re going to paste a warning about anything on their Web site. The first reason is that they’re trying to limit their liability. The second reason is that they were forced to do it.
Since Big Pharma doesn’t have any liability, that means that they were forced to put the warning on their site. And if they were forced to, that means that the United States government knew all along that the COVID vackseens and pregnancies don’t play well together. And yet the government allowed and, in some cases forced, pregnant women to be injected.
It turns out I was wrong. We didn’t have to wait for the women injected with the vackseens to give birth to see a problem. In many cases, troubles have occurred well before the happy day. Which, tragically, for many families didn’t turn out to be happy.
But, as tragic as that is, the worst may be yet to come.
It’s time for my next prediction, though it will be years before we know if this comes true. And if it does, that’s when the other shoe is going to drop.
I’m sure we’ve all heard the propaganda that the vackseens stay in the injection area. Turns out that isn’t true. The spike proteins have been found migrating to and congregating in various parts of the body. For some reason, the ovaries seem to be a favorite hangout place. We’ve also heard from “the experts” that the vackseens can’t cross the placental barrier and will never reach a developing fetus.
But “the experts” have been wrong about so many other things associated with these experimental drugs, I think it would be foolish to take their word on anything.
So, it’s entirely possible that the spike proteins could end up in the ovaries of newborn baby girls. No one can tell you for sure that it won’t. And what happens if the eggs contained in those ovaries are damaged or destroyed by said spike proteins?
Years from now, when those girls grow up and try to start their own families, we may just see the real tragedy of forcing women to be injected with a drug they didn’t want and didn’t need.
And finally…
I’d like to give a big thanks to my friend and loyal reader Lindy for suggesting today’s topic. Thanks Lindy!!!
